Jordan’s bizarre jurists

Jordanian legal-eagles burn the Israeli flag at Amman’s Palace of Justice and call for Daqamseh’s release

Jordanian legal-eagles burn the Israeli flag at Amman’s Palace of Justice and call for Daqamseh’s release

Unfortunately, not many Israelis recall that today is the 17th anniversary of the Naharayim massacre in which a Jordanian soldier cold-bloodedly massacred seven Israeli schoolgirls.

Yet that unspeakable crime is bizarrely, almost obsessively, remembered in Jordan and there it has oddly just made the headlines again – but not in the way Israelis would readily imagine. 

On Tuesday, Jordanian jurists had taken to the street and raucously protested the killing a day earlier of one of their colleagues, Raed Zeiter, at the Allenby Bridge crossing. Israel had officially expressed regret, shared its initial probe findings with the Jordanians and acceded to Jordanian demands to jointly investigate the matter. So far it all sounds cooperative and well-intentioned enough.

The reaction inside Jordan, however, took none of this into account and, if anything, exploited the incident to fan the flames against Israel and once more agitate for the release of the Naharayim slayer, which has incomprehensibly become a cause célèbre for all too many in Jordan, and, most disconcertingly of all, for its legal community.

Members of Jordan’s Bar Association didn’t rally after Zeiter’s shooting as outraged but hitherto impartial observers.  Before having even had the chance to examine and ascertain any of the facts, they demanded the extradition of “the Israeli murderers.” The Jordanian jurists, having a priori formulated their verdict, vowed to mete out their brand of justice. Its nature isn’t difficult to surmise.

They congregated at Amman’s Palace of Justice and burned an Israeli flag there to the sound of hoarse shouts calling for the expulsion of Israeli diplomats and the immediate release of Ahmed Daqamseh, who on March 13, 1997, callously shot to death seven young Israeli girls out on a school excursion.

We may well wonder what the Allenby Bridge incident has to do with the Naharayim bloodshed. Why use it as a means to facilitate Daqamseh’s release?

The truth is that the free-Daqamseh drive by Jordanian lawyers is hardly new and considerably preceded the latest pretext to revive it. The very fact that Daqamseh is accorded succor from Jordan’s legal hierarchy is, in and of itself, cause for grave concern.

Daqamseh was sentenced to seven life terms, which in the Jordanian context means 25 years in prison. Yet he is far from denounced and disowned by his compatriots.  The reverse is true. Three years ago then-Justice Minister Hussein Mjali didn’t hesitate to hector blatantly for Daqamseh’s release and to portray the cowardly killer of defenseless children as a laudable role model.

Moreover, Daqamseh is no chastened penitent. He boastfully told a Jordanian weekly that “if I could return to that moment, I would behave exactly the same way. Every day that passes, I grow stronger in the belief that what I did was my duty.”

Worse yet, the Jordanian legal sector isn’t alone in championing Daqamseh. Last year 110 members of Jordan’s parliament (out of a total of 150) had signed a petition for Daqamseh’s release. The country’s 14 trade unions, comprising over 200,000 members, lose no opportunity to agitate on his behalf. This speaks volumes about what parades as coexistence and morality next door to us.

Still we believe, maybe naively, that jurists are a special category that ought to know better – much better.  Surely even the minimally fair-minded must agree that the deliberate shooting of schoolgirls is as heinous a crime of hate as imaginable. There should be no equivocation here, much less identification with and glorification of the merciless perpetrator.

Perhaps our inherent trust in the equitable judgment of members of Jordan’s judiciary is misplaced. After all, several years ago, for example, Jordanian lawyers aggressively campaigned for arrest warrants to be issued against then-Knesset Speaker Reuven Rivlin and then-MK Aryeh Eldad. Their crime was describing Jordan as an intrinsic part of original Palestine.

That lawyers should so instantly condemn Israel for Zeiter’s death without even a rudimentary effort to learn what happened is equally unsettling.

Distressingly, King Abdullah keeps mum. The monarchy has obviously come a very long way away from King Hussein’s compellingly articulated contrition seventeen years ago.

7 thoughts on “Jordan’s bizarre jurists

  1. How can people who routinely abuse their own children, especially their daughters, empathize with the murder of someone else’s daughters.

  2. We have no friends. Everybody hates us. In spite of that, we are not united.
    The conflicts between us are not only between the Left and the Right,
    but, more importantly, between rich and poor Israelis.
    I get offers to buy luxurious condos in Tel Aviv.
    And solicitations to help poor kids celebrate Purim, and the needy families of IDF soldiers.
    We appear to be a mirror image of the class war in the U.S.
    It’s disheartening.

    • When have we Jews ever been united. Not now. Not in 1948. When the Romans besieged Jerusalem, Jewish factions still fought one another. The Cities food supply’s were burned by one of the factions. Israel and Judah often fought each other. So why would we change now? We are united only by one thing. When the come for the Jews they never care if we are secular or religious, Sephardi or Ashkenazi. They will still come for “us”. The Jews. And sooner or later, in every generation, they come for “us”.

  3. “Judge” Zeiter was a stupid terrorist and got what he deserved.
    WELL DONE IDF !
    If Israel would ever give up Judea and Samaria, people like him would try to destroy the sorry rest of the Jewish state.

  4. Pingback: » Jordan’s Bizarre Jurists

  5. What wiki says – and I’d advise all of you to read “Island of Peace Massacre” – is that “Ahmed Daqamseh, stated that he attacked because he was insulted and angered that the girls were whistling and clapping while he was praying.”
    How can anyone understand that mentality? Do they not have fresh teen-aged daughters? This explains honor killing more than anything else I could imagine. I am not the one to decide, but for me, I’d rather give up the Holy Mount than live with people like these.

  6. Pingback: Superficial BBC News report on Naharayim killer’s release | BBC Watch

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s