The kneejerk response in Israel’s Arab sector is to declare general strikes to underscore what is hyped as “popular anger.”
The latest expression of such “anger” took place last week when throughout Israel’s Arab communities businesses shut down for a day. Doubtless many were forced to do so but the truth is that many others were willingly swept up in the well-orchestrated volatility.
What did they aim to achieve? Whom did they aim to hurt?
Surely they realized that they are only shooting themselves in the foot. Their strikes simply and serially fail to awe the mystified Jewish majority. The only effect strikes have, if any, is to hone even further the already deeply ingrained impression that this country’s Arabs side unequivocally with Israel’s existential and implacable foes.
To resort to extreme understatement, this in no way contributes to the cause of coexistence.
Hot on the heels of a spate attacks against Jewish civilians in nearly every nook of this country, the Arab general strike invariably helped establish an association – whether subliminal or conscious – between Arab businessmen and the recurrent stabbings, shootings, fire-bombings and rock-throwing.
Such connections needn’t be iron-clad and incontestable. The delicate psycho-economic equilibrium can be easily upset by an intensifying sense of a tie between terrorists and the population that appears to support the deadly assaults on innocent Jews.
Inevitably this will keep Jews away – at least for the short haul – from Arab entrepreneurs. Some of the latter are already complaining vociferously against what they allege is a Jewish conspiracy to boycott them. Moreover, a sizable minority altogether charges that none other than the government is spearheading an anti-Arab boycott.
The plain fact, though, is that no boycott was ever declared, much less that one resulted from a plot by Israel’s leadership. This is the stuff of fables and fabrications that submerge Israel’s Arab communities in a mire of false premises, which distance them increasingly from the Jewish mainstream.
The inclination of most Jews is to avoid giving their custom to those who identify with genocidal enemies. These are individual decisions which no authority needs to pump up and which none can reverse. It’s mostly in the hands of the Arab sector to correct or exacerbate.
This is the essence of the point Nazareth Mayor Ali Salem tried to make recently when he drove by and spotted Joint (Arab) List chairman Ayman Odeh giving a TV interview on a Nazareth street corner. Salem shouted furiously at Odeh: “Get out of here, enough with the interviews. You ruined the city for us… There wasn’t a single Jew here today. Not even one!”
Bottom line: the incitement by Arab politicians, the radicalization in its wake, the terrorist frenzy this breeds and ensuing protests in support of the terrorists are bad for business. Thriving businesses aren’t the interest of a select few. They provide the livelihood which sustains many Arab communities, like the largest one in Nazareth.
Quite predictably, Salem was soon thereafter castigated by the very politicians who inflame passions in the Arab communities. He was denigrated as the traitor that he isn’t. Nothing was allowed to interfere with the raking of political capital from the premeditated escalation of a synthetic crisis.
This is but a replay of a staple tactic.
In 1936, at the instigation of Nazi-collaborator Haj Amin al-Husseini, a general strike in the Arab sector lasted for 175 days. In many cases it was enforced by intimidation. In the end, it took international intervention to extricate the Arabs from their own strike. Thousands of Arab merchants, shopkeepers, small manufacturers and farmers were driven into bankruptcy and numerous more lost their jobs.
If this economic war was geared to strangle Jewish subsistence in this country, the opposite occurred. The Jewish economy flourished as never before and a nascent Jewish state emerged from the havoc.
Yet the lesson of that seminal disaster had to be painfully relearned time and again – most recently in the wake of the 2000 riots. Incredibly, Israel’s Arab sector appears on the brink of imposing on itself more homemade wretchedness.
It has been said that this is a sadomasochistic culture: lustful to inflict pain on others, while simultaneously being aware of the inevitable, painful consequences for itself, and welcoming that prospect gleefully.
Arab “Israelis” are bad for Israel…
“What did they aim to achieve? Who did they aim to hurt?” Seems to me there might be a corollary; with the American Jews ‘blindly voting’ for the Democrats..one sure example; (Obama’s twice successful presidential nominations) ….and the American Jews didn’t even need to ‘Aim to Hurt’…..they will ‘suffer from the results of Obamas displeasure of Jews and the State of Israel’, and in my mind’ still don’t even ‘get the point’ of making ‘unknowledgeable decisions !!…..Parents, please take note; Teach your children the value of ‘learning history’s lessons’. Your children may ultimately benefit from learning of the ‘backgrounds, associations, and records of ‘Hopeful Candidates running for their preferred Offices’. Back to the ‘Arabs’…famous words from the late Abba Eban..”They never miss an opportunity to miss an opportunity”.
Pingback: Will Israel’s Arab sector impose on itself more homemade wretchedness? | RUTHFULLY YOURS
Throughout history, economic strikes rarely work, when the strikers need their targets more than the targets need them. But those who don’t(or won’t) think for themselves rarely pay attention to historical fact. That the Palestinians would even consider the idea of an orchestrated Jewish boycott against them, shows how small a role self-determination plays in their thinking. It also shows that many, if not most, Palestinians think Israelis behave like they do. On the other hand, such a boycott would be entirely appropriate.